Lets get naked

ooollah

OH GOD HE LIVES!

hydh

Hate to knock you off of your throne, but your art is pretty terrible.

It's pretty sad how pretentious you're being for how little you know about drawing.

Wait, you think you're also better at drawing than me too?

Please, show me your best drawing, I could use a good laugh.

Also, I'm not blindly attacking you, I read the whole argument, and I'm siding with fawx, because I think your a douche, AND wrong.

EDIT:I forgot to mention something.

You say his style is so "played out", when you yourself draw a bunch of anime shit.

If you weren't a dumbass then you would know that art has nothing to do with age.

You're a whole 2 years older than me and that suddenly makes everything you do better? Oh please, how ignorant are you? Pablo Picasso,(I'm not comparing my self to him) mastered realism at the age of 13.

Your art is awful, I just watched the crotch kick collab just to look at it. Your lines are shoddy as fuck, and you have no knowledge of color.

If you really think your better at drawing than me, then show me something that you call your best.

Thats from when Kemcab hacked me, I still haven't taken it down.

Okay, I'm just gonna answer this in a list because your comment is so long.

1."animation art is diffrent then drawn art"

-True, but someone who is good at it will be able to use minimalism, and still make it look good.

2."so saying you are better then someone (on reflection) is a lie."

-Not true, I know for a fact that I am better than me little cousin. One can have more knowledge in art than another, style is just skewing the world in different ways to how you like, in my opinion. But even if you are changing how it looks it still has to have the same proportions. And knowledge of the proportions is necessary, even if something is stylized.

3."also by saying that my art sucks.you have officially lost all credibility when you
talk to me."

-As said before, style has nothing to do with skill.

4."nobody learns anything truely useful from an art class"

-You learn a heap of technical skill that is incredibly useful, so I'm not sure what your talking about.

5."now onto the subject of people under the age of 15 being bad at "art" i admit that this MAY not be true. but for the most part it is."

-Absolutely not true, there are plenty of great 14 year artists, or artists that use to be 14, and were great when they were.

6."Critiqueing 14 year olds are probably the worst. because all of you (again, may not be true) are extreeeeemely opinionated."

-Anyone who is into art will give you a good critique, regardless of age. Anyone who is a dumbass with give you shitty critique, regardless of age.
Besides, critiquing is opinions backed up by facts.

7."besides yourself my "shody lines" may seem brillantly origional. toanother my "lack of acknowledgement of color" may seem stylized. so in short. art is in the eye of the beholder"

To a degree, "art is in the eye of the beholder", but only a small child would would think shoddy line-work is original, and only a child would think bad colors are stylized.

Technical still means something, saying that bad line-work is stylized is a terrible excuse for the lack of quality.

"I said most people under 15
suck. but then again the people that you know arnt
most when you look at the total amount of people
who are under 15."

Most of the people in the world suck, most arent artists regardless of age.

ttly i m 0n all th3 tym b4yb33.

Why thank you, it's always nice to know someone thinks my stuff is NICE.

Well if I wanted to be original, I would pick something other than a velociraptor, but i'm not, so I pick Shark.

No lie, you know it. BALLIN.